In 2024, Vladimir Putin's influence on Russia was marked by his re-election for another term, securing his leadership until at least 2030. This election was seen as a reaffirmation of his control over the nation's political landscape, with no significant opposition due to the suppression of dissent and the exclusion of anti-war candidates. Putin's strategy included maintaining stability by leveraging the defense sector, which received a significant portion of the budget, acting as a temporary economic booster amidst ongoing conflict and Western sanctions. However, this economic approach was not without its critics, who warned of potential future crises if the war continued or if military spending was curtailed.
 

On the security front, Putin navigated the complex situation in Ukraine, particularly responding to Ukraine's incursion into Russian territory like the Kursk region. Instead of direct Russian counterattacks, he engaged North Korean troops, highlighting an unconventional approach to national defense. This move, while controversial, was part of his broader strategy to assert territorial integrity and counter Western influence, showcasing Russia's ability to forge alliances with nations like North Korea and Mongolia to reduce diplomatic isolation. His diplomatic efforts included visits to these countries, aiming to counterbalance the effects of international sanctions and maintain Russia's stature on the global stage.
 

Despite these maneuvers, 2024 was not without its domestic challenges for Putin, including significant security incidents like the Moscow concert hall massacre, which raised questions about internal security. Public support within Russia remained strong, with Putin's narrative of defending national interests against Western aggression resonating with many, helping to maintain national unity. However, the ongoing war in Ukraine continued to drain resources and human lives, presenting a complex challenge for Putin's leadership. While some see his actions as saving Russia from further chaos, others view the increasing military and political control with concern for the country's long-term democratic and economic health.