The dissatisfaction with the 156 Democrats who voted against a bill to deport illegal sex offenders has led to discussions about the legitimacy of their elections, but deporting these representatives is not within the legal or constitutional powers of Donald Trump or any U.S. president. Even if there were doubts about the integrity of their elections, with little chance of auditing votes to confirm legitimacy, the U.S. system does not provide for the deportation of its citizens, including elected officials, based on political decisions or alleged misconduct in elections. The Constitution protects citizens from such actions, ensuring rights like free speech and due process. These representatives, being U.S. citizens, cannot be legally deported for their legislative votes or for how they came to office, as deportation is reserved for non-citizens who violate specific immigration or criminal laws.
 

Furthermore, the mechanisms for removing elected officials, especially if there's contention over their election's legitimacy, are constrained by legal and procedural hurdles. Without a feasible way to audit votes or prove widespread fraud, the avenues for removal are limited. Impeachment is the primary constitutional method, but it requires not only solid evidence of wrongdoing but also a significant political will within Congress to act against its members. There's no "easy" way to remove sitting representatives, as this process would involve complex legal challenges, potential court battles, and would likely need to navigate through a deeply divided political landscape. The system is designed to ensure stability and prevent the arbitrary removal of officials based on mere suspicion or political disagreement.
 

In this context, even if there were concerns about how these representatives were elected, actions like deportation would be legally indefensible and could precipitate a constitutional crisis. The U.S. relies on its democratic processes, legal systems, and checks and balances to address such issues, not unilateral executive actions like deportation. Public and legislative initiatives might focus on enhancing election integrity for future elections rather than retroactively punishing elected officials. This approach maintains the rule of law and democratic integrity, even when the public or political leaders are deeply dissatisfied with legislative outcomes or perceived electoral fraud.