Western intellectuals, particularly in America, fall prey to Third-Worldism because postwar culture replaced objective morality with emotionalism—the conviction that right and wrong spring from personal feelings rather than reason or tradition. This ambient philosophy, drilled into generations by Disney’s “believe in yourself,” Star Wars’ “trust your feelings,” and pop anthems’ “follow your heart,” elevates passion above principle and sincerity above truth. Plight becomes the ultimate moral currency: the more you suffer, the more you’re right. Conservatives spent decades battling relativism, only to miss the real enemy—a hypermoral Puritanism that weaponizes empathy and demands instant, visceral justice.

Emotionalism carries no fixed politics, yet it dovetails perfectly with Third-Worldism by framing distant grievances as intimate heart-tugs. Its individualism, however, ensures solidarity is fleeting; mobs flare on TikTok, then scatter when the next trend drops. What endures is managerialism: every grievance granted a veto, every feeling a policy mandate, grinding democracy into bureaucratic sludge. The same impulse that riots for Gaza today will tomorrow demand trigger warnings on classic novels—endless accommodation, zero resolution.

Third-Worldism promises revolution, but emotionalism lacks the stomach for it. Disney morality craves catharsis, not conquest; it settles for performative compassion and anesthetizing consumerism beneath a kindly, useless bureaucracy. The radicals cheering decolonization now may wake to find their fire cooled into endless HR seminars and rainbow lanyards. In the long run, the West’s sentimental heart doesn’t burn the system down—it swaddles it in plush stagnation. The Third-Worldists are riding a tiger that ends in a cubicle.