The inquiry stems from recent federal operations in Minnesota, including Operation Metro Surge, amid heightened tensions following protests over the fatal shooting of a local resident by an ICE agent. Walz and Frey have vocally opposed the large-scale federal presence, with Walz describing ICE actions as akin to a “modern-day Gestapo” and Frey encouraging residents to report federal agents. Prosecutors are assessing whether these statements crossed into criminal territory by encouraging obstruction of agents enforcing immigration laws passed by Congress. This development marks a rare federal scrutiny of state and local officials’ rhetoric in immigration enforcement clashes.
Reactions to the investigation have been sharply divided, with Walz denouncing it as a “weaponization” of the justice system against political opponents, labeling it an authoritarian tactic. Frey has similarly called it an attempt at intimidation, vowing not to back down. The probe highlights ongoing federal-state conflicts under the Trump administration, particularly in Democratic-led areas resisting expanded immigration crackdowns post-2024 election. As the investigation unfolds, it could set precedents for how public criticism of federal actions is treated under the law.
Additional ADNN Articles:
- President Trump Threatens Military Deployment in Minnesota Over ICE Attacks
- Miller Blasts Walz Over $9B Somali Fraud: Jail Time Coming
- Ilhan Omar Rages, Demands Rival Somali Clans Expelled After Backing Frey in Clan War Election
- Trump Exposes Soros, Hoffman Funding Antifa ICE Attacks, Vows RICO Probe