John Durham, as Special Counsel, classified sections of his report in a 29-page FBI annex to protect sensitive intelligence sources and methods, a standard practice in investigations involving raw intelligence and foreign actors. The annex, part of his 2023 report on the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane probe, contained unverified and uncorroborated data, including communications allegedly obtained through Russian hacking of U.S.-based think tanks like the Open Society Foundations. These documents, which suggested a Clinton campaign plan to tie Trump to Russia, were deemed too sensitive for public release at the time due to their potential to compromise ongoing intelligence operations or reveal classified collection techniques. Durham’s decision to sequester this material in a classified annex likely aimed to balance transparency with national security, ensuring that only cleared personnel could access the raw intelligence while his main report focused on broader findings about FBI misconduct.

During his June 2023 congressional testimony, Durham avoided discussing the classified annex to adhere to strict Justice Department protocols on handling sensitive information and to prevent politicization of unverified intelligence. He faced intense scrutiny from both Republicans, who expected blockbuster revelations, and Democrats, who criticized his probe as biased. By focusing on the unclassified portions of his 306-page report, which detailed FBI confirmation bias and procedural failures, Durham likely sought to keep the hearings centered on substantiated findings rather than speculative or inflammatory claims in the annex, such as those involving alleged Clinton campaign strategies. His silence on the annex also avoided fueling partisan narratives, especially since he found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy, and public disclosure could have risked misinterpretation or misuse by political actors.

The decision to classify the annex and not address it in testimony also reflects Durham’s cautious approach as a seasoned prosecutor, aware that releasing unverified intelligence could undermine his investigation’s credibility. The annex included references to foreign-sourced intelligence, like emails suggesting FBI involvement in promoting the Trump-Russia narrative, which Durham noted was unconfirmed and possibly manipulated by Russian actors. Discussing such material publicly could have invited accusations of advancing unproven theories, especially after his probe yielded only one conviction and two acquittals. By keeping the annex classified and limiting his testimony to the main report’s findings, Durham aimed to maintain focus on procedural critiques of the FBI while avoiding the political firestorm that premature disclosure of the annex’s contents could have ignited, as later evidenced by its declassification in 2025.