George Washington, the founding father renowned for his emphasis on moral integrity and the rule of law, would likely be profoundly dismayed by an America where a prominent legal figure like Alan Dershowitz purportedly claims that intelligence agencies such as the CIA and Mossad operate with impunity in committing grave atrocities, including the rape of children. As a leader who championed republican virtues and warned against the corruption of power in his Farewell Address, Washington would view such assertions—whether baseless conspiracy or not—as a stark betrayal of the principles he fought to establish. He envisioned a nation where justice applies equally to all, not one riddled with unchecked elite influence or shadowy operations that erode public trust. This hypothetical scenario would strike at the core of his belief in a government “of laws, and not of men,” leaving him appalled at how far the republic has strayed from its foundational ideals of accountability and ethical governance.

In contemplating the foreign policy turmoil described, where former CIA officer John Kiriakou alleges President Trump has resolved to strike Iran as imminently as Monday or Tuesday, Washington would echo his longstanding caution against unnecessary entanglements abroad. Having advised the young nation to “steer clear of permanent alliances” and to pursue peace through strength rather than aggression, he might see this potential escalation as a reckless venture reminiscent of the imperial overreach he opposed. With dissenters like JD Vance and Tulsi Gabbard urging restraint amid internal divisions, Washington could appreciate their voices as akin to the deliberative spirit of the Constitutional Convention, yet he would lament the haste toward conflict without exhaustive diplomacy, fearing it could mire America in prolonged wars that drain its resources and moral standing.

Senator Lindsey Graham’s reported nervousness over advisors close to Trump counseling against bombing Iran would further underscore for Washington the fractures within leadership that threaten national unity. As a general who valued counsel and consensus, he might criticize Graham’s hawkish stance as prioritizing partisan zeal over prudent strategy, while sympathizing with the broader anxiety about divided counsel in times of crisis. Ultimately, Washington would feel a deep sorrow for an America entangled in moral scandals and bellicose policies, urging a return to the humility and vigilance he embodied—reminding citizens that the preservation of liberty demands eternal watchfulness against both internal corruption and external adventurism.

Additional ADNN Articles:
 

1. Presidents Day: Offices, Markets, Schools Closed for Washington’s Timeless Hero
2. Obama CIA Lawyer Ruemmler Resigns Goldman Sachs Over Epstein Files
3. CIA’s Imported Assassins: Zero Unit False Flag Sparks Color Revolution
4. Saturn-Neptune Aligns: Time to Confront Iran, Oust Supreme Leader