President Donald Trump announced on January 31, 2026, via Truth Social that he had instructed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to withhold federal intervention in protests or riots occurring in Democratic-led cities unless local officials explicitly request assistance—and use the word “please.” This directive came amid escalating anti-immigration protests and riots stemming from the administration’s aggressive ICE enforcement actions, which Trump described as targeting “insurrectionists, agitators, and anarchists.” He emphasized that federal resources, including ICE, Border Patrol, or potentially the military, would only protect federal property as a backup measure, while local governments in “poorly run Democrat Cities” would need to formally ask for help before any broader involvement.
The statement highlighted Trump’s frustration with what he called “complaining” governors and mayors in blue states, framing the policy as a condition for cooperation: “Therefore, to all complaining Local Governments, Governors, and Mayors, let us know when you are ready, and we will be there—But, before we do so, you must use the word, ‘PLEASE.’” This approach effectively ties federal aid for quelling unrest to a display of deference, signaling a shift from automatic support during crises. Trump warned that any federal response would be “extremely powerful and tough,” underscoring his commitment to law and order while placing the onus on local leaders to acknowledge the need for outside intervention.
Critics viewed the “say please” requirement as a politicized stunt that could endanger public safety in cities experiencing unrest, while supporters saw it as holding accountable officials perceived as soft on crime or overly tolerant of protests. The policy aligns with Trump’s broader immigration crackdown, where federal forces are deployed selectively to defend national interests rather than routinely bail out Democratic strongholds. As protests continue, this stance has intensified debates over states’ rights versus federal authority in handling domestic disturbances.
Additional ADNN Articles: