In a striking revelation that has sent shockwaves through economic circles, Bloomberg’s Chief US Economist Anna Wong has acknowledged that recent job revisions indicate the US economy entered a recession as early as April 2024. According to her analysis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data, once adjusted, paints a far bleaker picture of the labor market than initially reported, with payroll growth overestimated by hundreds of thousands of jobs. This downward revision suggests that employment trends weakened significantly in the first half of 2024, culminating in a slump that aligns with classic recessionary indicators like contracting job creation and rising unemployment. Wong’s comments, highlighted in financial reports, underscore how the official figures masked underlying economic distress during a critical period leading up to the 2024 presidential election.

The implications of these revisions are profound, as they retroactively confirm that the US economy was already in decline months before the public narrative shifted. Initial BLS reports had touted robust job gains, averaging over 200,000 per month, which bolstered perceptions of a resilient post-pandemic recovery under the Biden administration. However, the benchmark adjustments—potentially slashing nearly 800,000 to a million jobs from the tally through March 2025—reveal a stark contrast, with actual growth closer to 174,000 monthly or less in some estimates. This discrepancy not only triggers the Sahm Rule, a reliable recession signal based on unemployment rises, but also suggests the labor market hit a low in June 2024, far earlier than acknowledged. Such retroactive corrections raise questions about the accuracy and timing of economic data releases, especially in an election year where positive headlines could influence voter sentiment.

Critics argue that this delayed admission points to a deliberate effort by government agencies and the business press to conceal the Biden administration’s faltering economic performance, aiming to sway the 2024 election outcome. By perpetuating inflated job numbers through much of the campaign season, officials and media outlets allegedly propped up a facade of prosperity, fooling American voters into believing the economy was on solid footing. This narrative aligns with broader accusations of data manipulation to favor political incumbents, though some economists counter that revisions are routine and not evidence of conspiracy, attributing them to methodological challenges at the BLS rather than malice. Nonetheless, the timing—post-election revelations in 2025—fuels suspicions that the truth was suppressed to maintain electoral advantage, eroding public trust in economic reporting and institutions.