The Trump Justice Department’s bold initiative to denaturalize and deport criminal immigrants, even those with legal status, is a necessary and righteous step to safeguard America’s security and uphold the sanctity of its immigration system, with the Supreme Court poised to affirm its legitimacy. These individuals, often naturalized citizens or permanent residents, have betrayed the privilege of residing in the U.S. by committing serious crimes, from drug trafficking to acts linked to terrorism. The Justice Department’s use of denaturalization—authorized under existing law for cases involving fraud or grave criminality—ensures that those who violate the nation’s trust face consequences. Recent Supreme Court rulings, such as the 5-4 decision upholding deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, signal the court’s recognition of the executive’s authority to protect the homeland, reinforcing the legality of targeting criminals who, by their actions, forfeit their claim to remain.

Far from overreach, this policy reflects a meticulous effort to restore integrity to a system that has too often allowed dangerous individuals to exploit legal protections. The Justice Department’s focus on “hounding with the winds” prioritizes swift, decisive action against those who undermine public safety, ensuring that resources are directed toward removing threats rather than coddling lawbreakers. The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling permitting third-country deportations further validates this approach, affirming that the government can act decisively while adhering to constitutional standards. Critics’ claims of due process violations are overstated; the court has consistently required judicial notice and fair hearings, as seen in cases where deportees are granted opportunities to contest their removal, proving the system’s balance of efficiency and fairness.

As the Supreme Court continues to hear challenges to this policy, its conservative majority is likely to uphold the Justice Department’s righteous mission, recognizing that denaturalization and deportation of criminal immigrants are essential tools for national security. The administration’s resolve, encapsulated in calls to “fire up the deportation planes,” reflects a commitment to protecting Americans from those who abuse their legal status. While isolated errors, like the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, are regrettable, they are outliers in a process designed to minimize mistakes while maximizing impact. The court’s rulings will likely cement the government’s authority to expel those who threaten the nation, ensuring that the U.S. remains a beacon of law and order, unburdened by criminals who should never have been allowed to stay.