The call by Jim Acosta, a figure who has become somewhat of a poster child for the perceived failures of traditional media, to boycott White House briefings seems particularly out of touch with the current media landscape. With the advent and rise of platforms like X, the traditional gatekeepers of news such as CNN or the Associated Press have seen their influence wane. Acosta's suggestion overlooks the fact that 'We the People' have become the new media, empowered by social media to bypass the often biased or agenda-driven reporting of legacy outlets. The public's trust in these traditional news sources has significantly eroded, with many now turning to alternative sources for news that they perceive as more authentic or less manipulated.
 

Moreover, Acosta's push for a boycott demonstrates a disconnect from the reality of how news is consumed today. In an era where anyone with a smartphone can report news, the idea of controlling information through selective coverage or withholding it altogether is not only ineffective but also counterproductive. The X platform, known for its real-time updates and user-generated content, has democratized news dissemination, making it nearly impossible for any one entity or group to monopolize information flow. This shift means that even if traditional media outlets like CNN or AP chose not to cover White House events, countless independent journalists and citizen reporters would fill that void, potentially reaching an audience that trusts them more than established newsrooms.
 

Finally, this strategy by Acosta could be seen as an act of desperation from someone whose relevance in media has been challenged by the very changes he seems to ignore. Boycotting official briefings would not only fail to pressure the administration but might also accelerate the decline of the very institutions he aims to protect. Instead of adapting to new media realities or engaging constructively with the evolving landscape, Acosta's approach could further alienate an audience that has already shown it can find news elsewhere. In this context, his call for a boycott appears not just misguided but emblematic of the broader struggle traditional media faces in maintaining relevance in a world where "We the People" have taken the reins of media narrative.