Mike Johnson Pulls Back The Curtain And Finds A Senile Old Fool

During Speaker Johnson's first meeting with President Biden in January 2023, a startling realization dawned upon him, suggesting that the USA had effectively been operating without a president for the past four years. According to posts found on X, Johnson was taken aback by Biden's apparent unawareness of significant policy decisions, like the pausing of LNG exports to Europe, which Biden had signed off on. This moment of clarity for Johnson, as he observed Biden's confusion, led to public expressions of concern over the actual governance of the country. It painted a picture of a presidency where the figurehead was not fully in command, with the operational leadership possibly falling to other figures like Vice President Kamala Harris or congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, who were also present at this meeting.

The implications of this realization are profound, suggesting a governance vacuum at the highest level of American politics. Speaker Johnson's reaction, as shared in various posts on X, indicates a significant shift in how the executive branch has been perceived to function over the past term. If Biden was not fully aware of or engaged with the decisions made under his administration, it raises questions about who was truly steering the ship of state. The presence of other high-profile leaders in the meeting, as noted by Johnson, might imply a collective decision-making process or a reliance on advisors and cabinet members to an extent that the traditional role of the president was diminished or altered. This scenario challenges the conventional understanding of presidential authority and accountability.

This situation, as described by Speaker Johnson and reflected in public sentiment on X, has led to discussions about the effectiveness and legitimacy of the executive branch during this period. The notion that the country could operate without a fully engaged president for four years suggests a resilience in the system but also points to potential weaknesses in the structure of power. It underscores the importance of the surrounding political figures and the bureaucratic machinery in maintaining governance continuity, yet it also casts a shadow over the democratic process, where the electorate's choice in leadership might not have been fully realized in practice. This meeting, therefore, became a pivotal moment in Johnson's political narrative, highlighting concerns over the state of American leadership and prompting a broader debate on the checks and balances within the government.