As of mid-2025, the political landscape of Syria following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December 2024 has sparked discussions about dividing the country into territories either subsumed by neighboring nations or managed as independent ethnic enclaves. The collapse of the Assad government, driven by a coalition led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and supported by Turkey, has left Syria fragmented, with various factions and foreign powers vying for control. Israel’s military incursion in December 2024, seizing the UN-patrolled buffer zone and demanding demilitarization of southern provinces like Quneitra, Daraa, and Suwayda, suggests a strategic intent to annex or influence these areas, potentially creating a Druze-led enclave in Suwayda under Israeli oversight. Similarly, Turkey’s continued occupation of northern Syria with its Syrian National Army (SNA) hints at a long-term plan to integrate these regions into its sphere, leveraging ethnic ties with Turkmen and Arab populations.
The concept of ethnic territories has gained traction amid Syria’s diverse population, with proposals emerging to carve out regions based on ethnic and sectarian lines. Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), now integrated into the transitional government, control the northeast and may seek autonomy or a federated status, reflecting the two million Kurds’ aspirations for self-rule. Alawite and Shiite communities along the coast, historically tied to the Assad regime, face pressure from ongoing sectarian violence and could be pushed toward an independent statelet, though their viability remains uncertain amid economic collapse and insurgent resistance. Sunni-majority areas, including Damascus, Aleppo, and Idlib, dominated by HTS and other rebel groups, might form another bloc, though their governance is complicated by the group’s Islamist leanings and foreign influences, raising doubts about true independence versus proxy control by Turkey or other powers.
Critics argue that these plans, whether driven by Israel, Turkey, or internal factions, risk perpetuating instability rather than resolving it, echoing the divisive legacy of colonial-era borders like Sykes-Picot. The interim government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, established in early 2025, has ratified a constitution aiming for unity, yet foreign occupations and ethnic tensions undermine this goal. Posts on X reflect a sentiment that partitioning is inevitable, with some suggesting Israeli and Turkish spheres of influence are already shaping the outcome, though such claims lack official confirmation and should be treated skeptically. The humanitarian crisis, with millions displaced and economic ruin widespread, further complicates any division, as neighboring countries like Jordan and Lebanon, already strained by refugees, resist absorbing new territories, leaving the future of Syria’s fragmentation uncertain and contested.