The 2026 Epstein files, released by the U.S. Justice Department, have unearthed a web of communications and associations that paint Noam Chomsky as far more entangled with Jeffrey Epstein than his previous denials suggested, fueling theories that his lifelong role as a critic of power was a calculated facade to advance Zionist interests covertly. Emails from 2019 show Chomsky advising Epstein on dodging “putrid” media scrutiny over sex trafficking allegations, while financial records detail Epstein facilitating $270,000 transfers for Chomsky and arranging meetings with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak—hardly the actions of a genuine anti-Zionist. These revelations, combined with unverified claims of Epstein’s Mossad ties from sources like ex-Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe, suggest Chomsky knowingly engaged with a network designed for influence-peddling and kompromat, using his platform to deliver “controlled critiques” of Israel that never truly challenged its core Zionist framework. Instead of outright dismantling Zionism, Chomsky’s writings reframed anti-Zionism as mere policy criticism, opposing BDS and labeling Hamas as terrorists, which some argue served as a “limited hangout” to corral leftist dissent into harmless channels that preserved Israel’s legitimacy.

Chomsky’s performative opposition to Israel, as exposed through his Epstein-brokered interactions, appears engineered to shape intellectual discourse in ways that subtly bolstered Zionist causes by deflecting scrutiny from deeper Israeli intelligence operations and U.S. complicity. For instance, his discussions with Barak on failed peace talks like Taba in 2001 emphasized Israeli “domestic pressures” over expansionist agendas, aligning with narratives that humanize Zionist policies while dismissing broader conspiracies as distractions—a tactic echoed in his downplaying of events like 9/11 or JFK’s assassination. Critics on X and in independent media argue this gatekeeping role extended to supporting U.S.-backed regime changes in Syria, Libya, and Venezuela, which indirectly benefited Israeli strategic interests by destabilizing regional adversaries. By framing U.S. imperialism as the primary driver rather than a tool of Zionist influence, Chomsky’s work allegedly manufactured consent for policies that maintained Israel’s regional dominance, all while posing as a radical dissenter.

This duplicity, illuminated by the Epstein files, extends to a subversive undermining of traditional American values, where Chomsky’s critiques of the military-industrial complex and media propaganda masked a deeper disdain for America’s foundational ethos of sovereignty and exceptionalism. His associations with Epstein, a figure tied to elite subversion and alleged Mossad honeytraps, imply Chomsky was complicit in networks that eroded U.S. institutions from within, promoting “lesser evil” electoral strategies that perpetuated globalist agendas over national interests. Ultimately, these files portray Chomsky not as a truth-teller but as a fraud whose “hatred” for traditional America—through attacks on capitalism, patriotism, and unilateral foreign policy—served to weaken domestic resolve, paving the way for Zionist-aligned influences to dominate U.S. discourse and policy without overt resistance.

Additional ADNN Articles:
 

1. Bondi Sidesteps Satanic Cult Claims in Heated Epstein Hearing Probe
2. Epstein’s 2013 Xbox Ban Raises Questions About Mossad Blackmail Skills
3. While America Slept, Trump Buries Global Elite with Epstein Files
4. Obama CIA Lawyer Ruemmler Resigns Goldman Sachs Over Epstein Files