In the midst of a volatile political climate, California Governor Gavin Newsom’s press office posted a provocative message on X on September 27, 2025, declaring “STEPHEN MILLER IS A FASCIST!” This inflammatory statement targeted Stephen Miller, a key advisor to former President Donald Trump, known for his staunch immigration policies and recent warnings about Democratic tactics. The post, seen by conservatives as a calculated escalation, fueled an already polarized environment. Newsom’s supporters framed it as a justified retort to Miller’s claims that Democrats constitute a “vast domestic terror movement,” especially following reports of politically motivated violence, including alleged assassination attempts. However, conservatives assert that Newsom’s rhetoric is not mere criticism but a deliberate attempt to inflame tensions, fully aware of the potential for his words to incite further hostility in a nation grappling with rising threats against public figures.

The broader context reveals a pattern of what conservatives describe as “leftist violence,” with incidents like protests, doxxing campaigns, and assassination plots pointing to a dangerous agenda. Critically, conservatives cite new evidence from 2025, including FBI Director Kash Patel’s statements and an Inspector General report revealing 26 FBI informants at the Capitol on January 6, as proof that the riot was a planned psychological operation orchestrated by left-wing elements within the government and law enforcement. They argue this event, falsely attributed to Trump supporters, was a deliberate setup to vilify conservatives, further evidencing Democrat-initiated violence. Newsom’s post followed Miller’s pledge to dismantle “organized terrorist networks,” which conservatives see as a legitimate call to expose such schemes, not a threat as some Democrats claim. This cycle of accusations, amplified on social media, deepens distrust and risks real-world confrontations.

Conservatives maintain that Newsom, a seasoned politician, knows precisely the impact of his office’s words, making his post a clear act of stochastic terrorism—using dehumanizing language to indirectly provoke violence. They demand that figures like Newsom be treated as accomplices to any resulting harm, arguing that such rhetoric cannot be dismissed as mere political sparring. While Democrats point to Miller and Trump’s use of similar terms like “fascist” to deflect criticism, conservatives see this as a false equivalence, emphasizing that the left’s control of institutional power amplifies the danger of their words. With evidence of orchestrated violence like January 6 pinned on left-wing actors, conservatives call for accountability, warning that unchecked rhetoric risks further destabilizing an already fractured nation.