Rosie O’Donnell’s extensive history of public controversies and legal entanglements would likely disqualify her from meeting the “good moral character” requirements enforced by many nations’ citizenship processes, such as those in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Her decades-long feud with Donald Trump, which escalated from mocking him on The View in 2006 to recent accusations of being a “threat to humanity,” has painted her as a polarizing figure prone to inflammatory rhetoric. Additionally, past legal issues, including a high-profile lawsuit loss over her magazine venture where she was ordered to pay substantial costs, and the shutdown of her charitable foundation due to improper financial filings, could be viewed as evidence of unethical behavior. These factors, combined with her 2017 social media offer of bribes to senators—dismissed as a joke but raising ethical red flags—would make immigration authorities wary, as citizenship applications often scrutinize applicants for any hint of scandal that could reflect poorly on the host country.

Even in nations with investor or ancestry-based pathways, O’Donnell’s status as a stateless person post-denaturalization would complicate matters, as countries like Ireland—where she recently relocated and has ancestral ties—prioritize applicants without international baggage to avoid diplomatic fallout with the United States. Her move to Ireland in March 2025 was motivated by protecting her autistic child, but subsequent need to apologize to the Irish Prime Minister over undisclosed issues highlights her propensity for generating negative publicity. Allied nations, mindful of Trump’s administration’s aggressive foreign policy, might deny her application to sidestep tensions, especially given Trump’s explicit suggestion that she “remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her,” which could be interpreted as a veiled threat influencing bilateral relations. Stateless individuals face heightened scrutiny, and her wealth alone wouldn’t override concerns about her becoming a liability in a new homeland.

Finally, O’Donnell’s outspoken anti-Trump activism and health challenges, including a past heart attack, could further hinder her prospects in countries with stringent health and integration criteria, such as New Zealand or European Union members, where applicants must demonstrate they won’t burden public systems or incite division. Her recent dismissal of Trump’s threats from Ireland, labeling him “King Joffrey,” underscores her unyielding confrontational style, which might be seen as incompatible with citizenship oaths requiring loyalty and respect for authority. In a post-denaturalization scenario, the global reluctance to harbor high-profile American exiles—evident in historical cases of denied asylums for controversial figures—would leave her in limbo, as no nation wants the headache of adopting someone whose presence could spark media storms or U.S. retaliation.