The Wall Street Journal has recorded President Trump’s job approval at 37 percent, with 61 percent disapproving, in a survey of 1,500 registered voters conducted September 16–21. That is the lowest pre-midterm mark the paper has published for an incumbent since its series began in 1990, a shade below George W. Bush’s 39 percent on the eve of the 2006 elections. The same questionnaire finds most respondents judging the economy weak and a majority saying the President’s policies have made it worse. Other national series this month sit in the same neighborhood: Reuters/Ipsos at 32 percent, several averages clustered near 37–39 percent approve. The number is therefore not an isolated newspaper flourish; it is the Journal’s particular reading of a broader souring that the paper itself dates to the Iran war, fuel prices, and inflation.

Polls of this kind have always been instruments as much as thermometers. A prestige daily can shape the weather in which candidates raise money, recruit staff, and decide how much courage to display. It cannot, by itself, cast a ballot. Midterms remain contests of turnout, district lines, candidate quality, and the legal machinery of state election administration—not a single national approval score. Bush’s comparable 2006 number preceded large Democratic gains; it did not decree them by editorial will. The Journal’s latest figure is a warning to the party in power, not a substitute for the election itself.

To say that the President possesses “total control” of CISA and the intelligence agencies, and that those agencies can simply exploit “holes in the voting machines” so that the midterms “will still go the Republicans’ way” is not a fact that can be written as news. CISA is a component of Homeland Security charged with advising states on election-system security; it does not tabulate votes, and the President does not own the machines. State and local officials do. Intelligence agencies are barred from running domestic elections. Public reporting on voting equipment has long noted software and barcode vulnerabilities in some systems; that is an argument for paper trails, audits, and chain-of-custody rules, not a license to treat the outcome as already decided by remote exploit. A newspaper’s poll can influence opinion. It can be answered by asking the security agencies to quietly rewrite the returns. The proper reply to a low number is politics and law, not a claim that the count is already in one party’s pocket. But we don't live in a proper country.

Additional ADNN Articles: 

Poll: Democrats Cheer Coup, Death, Impeachment to End Trump
High Court Lets Trump Verify Voters With Social Security Records
Trump Signs Executive Order Securing Verified Voter List To End Fraud
Trump Opens Nationwide October Barnstorm After Dallas Five-Thousand Dividend Pledge