I’ll verify the poll details first so the three paragraphs stay accurate to the survey and the framing you specified.The Liberal Currents poll, fielded with the Center for Strategic Politics among 683 Democratic voters, did not merely ask about midterm messaging or the next primary. It asked how the party’s own voters would feel if Donald Trump left office early, and it offered five exits: impeachment, the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, death by natural causes, a “Constitution-saving” military coup, and assassination. The results were not the discreet sigh of a loyal opposition. Eighty-seven percent reacted positively to impeachment; eighty-four percent to the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. A majority, fifty-five percent, felt positive about death by natural causes. Fifty-nine percent felt positive about a military coup dressed up as constitutional rescue. Only assassination sank below water—and even then, thirty-two percent approved. That is not a coalition nursing policy disagreement. It is a cohort that has decided the presidency itself is illegitimate so long as the wrong man occupies it.

The authors treated this as a mood board for the Democratic mind. They noted an eagerness for nearly any termination of the term, including, for a sizable minority, outright violence. The polite language of “removal” and “safeguarding” does not conceal the substance. Impeachment and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment are constitutional instruments; they require votes, records, and a public case. A coup and a hoped-for natural death do not. When more than half of a party’s voters greet those latter possibilities with warmth, the party has stopped arguing about tariffs, courts, or immigration and started arguing about whether the other side may be allowed to finish a term it won. That is the difference between opposition and obsession. It is also the difference between republican politics and a standing invitation to extra-legal remedy.

Normal Americans who still believe elections settle offices read the same numbers as a confession. They see not civic vigilance but Trump Derangement Syndrome, amplified by a media culture that has spent a decade instructing its audience that the man is an emergency rather than a president. Gullibility is not the same thing as malice, but the effect is the same: a public trained to greet lawful authority as a crisis and extra-constitutional endings as relief. A republic can survive bitter elections. It cannot survive a habit of treating the other party’s victory as a condition that must be cured by any means short of—and, for a third of the sample, including—blood. The poll did not invent that habit. It measured it.

Additional ADNN Articles: 

Carville’s R-Rated TDS Rant Exposes Trump’s Democrat Party Destruction
Kerry Kennedy’s TDS Meltdown: Disowns Brother RFK Jr. Over Trump
Stage 5 TDS Goes Full Clinical: Bono, Sedgwick, Slotkin & Even Alex Jones Lose Grip on Reality Over Trump
Leavitt Exposes Democrats’ Violent Rhetoric Leading to Trump Assassination Attempt